{"id":191,"date":"2024-04-30T10:49:12","date_gmt":"2024-04-30T10:49:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/co-sustain.eu\/?page_id=191"},"modified":"2026-01-22T16:23:46","modified_gmt":"2026-01-22T16:23:46","slug":"project-results","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/co-sustain.eu\/et\/project-results\/","title":{"rendered":"Projekti tulemused"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” module_alignment=”center” custom_margin=”4rem||||false|false” custom_margin_tablet=”3rem||||false|false” custom_margin_phone=”2rem||||false|false” custom_margin_last_edited=”on|phone” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.25.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.25.1″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_heading title=”Project Results” _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_heading][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” module_alignment=”center” custom_margin=”|328px||auto||” locked=”off” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.25.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_code _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

\/\/<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n

Flyers <\/h3>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/i> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/pee> Download File<\/a> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

–> <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n

Best and worst practices from historic examples on the management and support of various forms of political participation <\/h3>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/i> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

This project result will provide policymakers with insights from the management and support of latent and manifest forms of political participation in different European countries in the past. Findings and main conclusions from the research on historic examples of political participation for policymakers <\/i> <\/pee> Download File<\/a> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n

Cross-case analysis of system maps for various forms of political participation across Europe <\/h3>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/i> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

The cross-case analysis of the data (system maps, social network analysis, etc ) for various forms of political participation across Europe aims to allow researchers to develop a better understanding of their dynamics at the initiative level and macro system level. The similarities and differences between the system maps will also highlight the social, economic, political, and cultural factors at play. <\/pee> Download File<\/a> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n

Assessment of deliberation panels for various forms of political participation <\/h3>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/i> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

This report on the assessed outputs and outcomes of the deliberation panels will allow citizens, policymakers, public authorities, researchers and other stakeholders to gain a better understanding of the potential of deliberation panels to create change, based on multistakeholder perspectives. <\/pee> Download File<\/a> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n

Policy recommendations and practical guidelines for a sustainable and democratic transition <\/h3>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/i> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

This project result will present recommendations based for a sustainable and democratic transition, including steps, methods, tools and advice to animate deliberation panels and policies and measures. <\/pee> Download File<\/a> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n

Context and stakeholders analysis for historic examples of political participation (D1.2) <\/h3>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/i> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

The aim of the context and stakeholder analysis is to gather information and data that will allow to better understand the temporal, social, and spatial scope and circumstances in which Collective Action Initiatives (CAIs) emerged and evolved within the 18 historical case studies (HE) analyzed. <\/pee> Project Deliverable:<\/strong><\/pee> class=”et_pb_button btn temp” style=”background-color: orange !important; color: white !important; padding: 10px 20px; border-radius: 6px; text-decoration: none; display: inline-block; cursor: pointer !important;” download> Download D1.2 <\/a> Other outputs:<\/strong><\/pee> class=”et_pb_button btn temp” style=”background-color: orange !important; color: white !important; padding: 10px 20px; border-radius: 6px; text-decoration: none; display: inline-block; cursor: pointer !important;” download> Download summary <\/a> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n

Impact Assessment Framework (D1.3) <\/h3>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/i> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

The Impact Assessment Framework (IAF) provides a roadmap for the impact assessment of deliberation panels, including indicators and goals. IAF\u2019 s goal is to gain a comprehensive understanding of the impact of the interventions co-created with the case study groups. For this, IAF defines approaches and tools to evaluate changes at both the individual level (through individual interviews and surveys) and the group level (using impact stories and participatory observation of deliberative processes). As such, the IAF enables qualitative and quantitative assessment of the changes brought about by project interventions in terms of social cohesion, empowerment, inclusion\/exclusion, and capacity and community building. <\/pee> Project Deliverable:<\/strong><\/pee> class=”et_pb_button btn temp” style=”background-color: orange !important; color: white !important; padding: 10px 20px; border-radius: 6px; text-decoration: none; display: inline-block; cursor: pointer !important;” download> Download D1.3 <\/a> Other outputs:<\/strong><\/pee> class=”et_pb_button btn temp” style=”background-color: orange !important; color: white !important; padding: 10px 20px; border-radius: 6px; text-decoration: none; display: inline-block; cursor: pointer !important;” download> Download summary <\/a> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n

Literature review on the triggers and management of latent and manifest forms of political participation (D2.1) <\/h3>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/i> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

This paper reviews the literature on triggers and management of latent and manifest forms in the context of climate transition. The report provides a thorough analysis of existing knowledge on political participation related to environmental, political and social priorities. The method employs a systematic literature review based on the Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar databases, with queries built around three main topics: triggers for change, forms of participation and strategies for demanding social change. CADIMA record management software was used for screening and selection, and consistency was maintained through double-independent evaluation based on established criteria. This thorough procedure led to the selection of a group of 77 articles (from the original database of 444 records) for in-depth qualitative and quantitative evaluation. <\/pee> Project Deliverable:<\/strong><\/pee> class=”et_pb_button btn temp” style=”background-color: orange !important; color: white !important; padding: 10px 20px; border-radius: 6px; text-decoration: none; display: inline-block; cursor: pointer !important;” download> Download D2.1 <\/a> Other outputs:<\/strong><\/pee> class=”et_pb_button btn temp” style=”background-color: orange !important; color: white !important; padding: 10px 20px; border-radius: 6px; text-decoration: none; display: inline-block; cursor: pointer !important;” download> Download summary <\/a> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n

Cross-case analysis of the triggers, management and impact of latent and manifest forms of political participation (D2.2) <\/h3>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/i> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

The report provides a comprehensive cross-case analysis of the triggers, management, and impacts oflatent and manifest forms of political participation, with a focus on Collective Action Initiatives (CAIs)across diverse socio-political and environmental contexts. The report employs a multi-methodologicalapproach, integrating semi-structured interviews, textual analysis, social network analysis, and systemmapping within the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) framework. This analysis aims to elucidate the dynamicsof political participation, its evolution, and its implications for democratic innovation and sustainabilitytransitions.<\/pee>\u00a0Project Deliverable:<\/strong><\/pee>\u00a0 class=”et_pb_button btn temp” style=”background-color: orange !important; color: white !important; padding: 10px 20px; border-radius: 6px; text-decoration: none; display: inline-block; cursor: pointer !important;” download> Download D2.2 <\/a> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n

Analysing best (and worst) practices to support and manage latent and manifest forms of political participation (D2.3) <\/h3>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/i> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

The main objective of this report was to identify key lessons, strategies, or factors that influence and shape political participation for a democratic climate transition. Special emphasis was placed on determining which factors were perceived as most and least influential in promoting political participation. The task also aimed to summarise general insights into the factors that support different modes of political engagement, assess how specific contextual features shaped participation, and illustrate these dynamics with qualitative evidence. Additionally, where relevant, extra indicators were considered based on the specifics and data availability of each case.<\/p <\/pee>\u00a0Draft of the project deliverable:<\/strong><\/pee>\u00a0\u00a0class=”et_pb_button btn temp”style=”background-color: orange !important; color: white !important; padding: 10px 20px; border-radius: 6px; text-decoration: none; display: inline-block; cursor: pointer !important;”download>Download D2.3<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Other outputs:<\/strong><\/pee>A short article reflecting on the enabling and hindering factors for latent and manifest forms of political participation produced by researchers at Ecoserveis\u00a0class=”et_pb_button btn temp”style=”background-color: orange !important; color: white !important; padding: 10px 20px; border-radius: 6px; text-decoration: none; display: inline-block; cursor: pointer !important;”download>Download article<\/a>\u00a0<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n

Results of deliberation panels (D3.1) <\/h3>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/i> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

This deliverable will be available once approuved.<\/em><\/p <\/pee><\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n

Assessment of the outputs and outcomes (D4.1) <\/h3>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/i> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

This deliverable will be available once approuved.<\/em><\/p <\/pee><\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n

Cross-case comparative analysis (D4.2) <\/h3>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/i> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

This deliverable will be available once approuved.<\/em><\/p <\/pee><\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n

Policy recommendations for a sustainable and democratic transition (D4.3) <\/h3>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/i> <\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

This deliverable will be available once approuved.<\/em><\/p <\/pee><\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n